America are currently preparing for their party elections to decide the main candidate from each party for President. As things stand in the Democrat Party, Hillary Clinton is currently in the lead on the polls with an estimate of 51.6% of the votes, whilst Bernie Sanders stands at 37.2%.
If you ask anyone in this country, they likely won't have heard of Mr Sanders. Could this reflect America's view of Sanders? I hope not.
The thing is, Bernie Sanders
is the good guy. He wants to rebuild America's crumbling infrastructure, combat global warming, have a fair tax reform, protect vulnerable Americans, make healthcare free, tackle the dominance of wall street, make college affordable, raise the minimum wage and bring in equal pay. I could go on, but those are some of the main reasons why Sanders should be the Democrat candidate.
Clinton on the other hand, proves awfully hazy on many key policy areas. She hasn't given her voters as clear plans as Sanders has. This is an awfully important thing to bear in mind when voting, because any politician can easily say they'll commit to something. We have no idea if they have a clear plan for it or not. In Clinton case, many of her possible voters just don't know.
Clinton has also proved to be one of those 'bandwagon' politicians; meaning she will jump to support a cause when it becomes popular to. For example, compared to Sanders, her campaign efforts for same sex marriage were rather poor. But when the law came into effect, she quickly got her team to create a range of LGBT+ products (e.g; t-shirts with her logo in rainbow lettering). If that isn't the epitome of corporate capitalism then I don't know what is!
'But how come Clinton is top of the polls then?' I hear you ask. Because her voters just haven't simply been informed. I'm not here to slander the American population, because many of the most respectable political figures have been American. And I hardly blame the population. It's not everyone's cup of tea to go and deliberately research political candidates in their spare time, and that's okay! It should be up to the media to provide equal coverage of each candidate, and make sure the voters have a clear understanding of who they're voting for. But the media haven't done this. This cartoon may shed some light as to why Clinton has fared so well this time.
The popular media of the US are on Clinton's side. Obviously they're not always blatantly stating "Hillary should win! I love Hillary!" but they are showing support to her by refusing to show Sanders' views and policies clearly.
Many people like Clinton because she's a woman. It would be wonderful to have a female president, and gender representation in politics is an extremely important thing. However, if we overlook this, is Clinton really the better candidate?
The media are horribly selective when it comes to showing politics. They'll pick a candidate they find the most 'socially acceptable' to support and report on their good stories. On the other hand, they'll report on incredibly controversial candidates to sell a story. If I was a US citizen, I'd much rather hear about Sanders' plans to make healthcare free than what Trump has been saying.
The thing that the media take for granted is that, generally, people believe them. If they news say it's good, the public say it's good. This is why the media shouldn't be scared to provide more coverage on an outsider like Sanders.
Aside from her media support, Clinton has received massive donations. A politician with the most money will create the most impressive (policies aside) campaign. They'll be able to get support from large business and famous people, book to speak at well-known venues and produce the most leaflets and billboards. Clinton has received most of her monetary support from big businesses and banks such as Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase & Co. This really shows how much of a massive influence big businesses play in political results, and that's exactly what Sanders has been campaigning against.
Sanders' main donations have come from trade unions. Does this show that he is more of a people's person than Clinton? I think it does.
It shouldn't be up to the media or big businesses to decide who the president should be. It's up to the people.
So that should show you that America is wrong with Clinton. I'm not saying, definitely don't vote for her, because she has many many genuinely informed supporters. I'm just saying take your time to read about the other candidates, and don't be afraid to support an outsider like Sanders.